HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN Forum Index HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN
HoTWiReZ's FoRuM


Rosewill Armor EVO Case Review: Sometimes Performance Isn't

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN Forum Index -> Technology News
News BoT
RSS Feed


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 32637

 PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:00 am    Post subject: Rosewill Armor EVO Case Review: Sometimes Performance Isn't Reply with quote Back to top

<p> As NewEgg's house brand, Rosewill has been growing in very interesting ways. Being the house brand of a major electronics retailer means dipping your toe into a lot of different markets, and Rosewill has expanded dramatically, to the point where their products are starting to crop up on <em>other vendors' sites</em>. At the same time, those products are gaining attention in their own right. Rosewill's own Thor v2 may not be the best built enclosure, but it's a dynamite performer and can oftentimes be found at a bargain.</p> <p align="center"> </p> <p> Rosewill has also been fairly aggressive about pursuing enthusiasts. It's not enough to simply have a product and offer it; you don't see Best Buy sending out Dynex or Insignia televisions to websites for review. There's also sweet money to be had in chasing mid-to-high end buyers, and that's where the Armor EVO comes in. The EVO is a fairly modestly sized tower capable of supporting E-ATX motherboards and promises healthy cooling performance. It also comes with an unusually optimistic MSRP: $119. Is it worth the money, or did Rosewill misfire?</p><div class='mf-viral'><table border='0'><tr><td valign='middle'></td><td valign='middle'></td></tr></table></div><br/><br/>

Read more...

Source: AnandTech
This channel features the latest computer hardware related articles.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN Forum Index -> Technology News All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN © HoTWiReZ
Cobalt 2.0 phpBB theme/template © 2002-2005 Jakob Persson (forumthemes/bbstyles)
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group